The time-saving power of automated reconciliations for modern tax teams — Thomson Reuters Tax & Accounting

Share This Post

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on email

It’s not just about speed, it’s about confidence.

If you’ve ever felt like your indirect tax team spends more time tracking down discrep­ancies than driving business value, you’re not alone.

In multi­na­tional companies, highly trained tax profes­sionals are stuck in a familiar cycle: downloading data from government portals, comparing ERP systems with compliance tools, and manually inves­ti­gating non-compli­ances, often in conjunction with tight filing deadlines.

The pressure is increasing. Tax author­ities in Romania, Hungary, Chile and Mexico now require rapid recon­cil­i­ation of pre-filled tax returns, giving companies just days instead of weeks to explain discrep­ancies or face penalties and mandatory payments.

This shift to real-time reporting means your team can no longer afford to discover errors during month-end close. Then it’s too late.

The risk of fines, reputa­tional damage and strained relation­ships with tax author­ities increases every time a discrepancy goes unnoticed.

Jump to ↓

The manual coordi­nation effort


Why automated voting is the great liberator


The strategic value of automated voting


Time to act: Reclaim time with automated voting

The manual coordination effort

Let’s talk about what “manual tuning” really means in practice. Your team juggles data from multiple ERPs, billing systems, e‑invoicing platforms, and compliance tools, each with its own format and specifics. Tax point differ­ences, foreign exchange conver­sions, credit notes and billing deadline issues create a tangled web of potential discrep­ancies.

Without centralized automation, every voting cycle becomes a detective mission. Team members sometimes spend hours extracting files, creating complex spread­sheets, and cross-refer­encing line items.

The process is not only time-consuming, but also error-prone and creates an unnec­essary feedback loop: more manual work can lead to more errors, which requires even more manual inves­ti­gation.

A Forrester Total Economic Impact study found that companies using legacy approaches had error rates of 3% before recon­cil­i­ation efforts, meaning three full-time employees had to spend 20% of their time just inves­ti­gating and correcting invoice errors. That’s talent and budgets that could be deployed elsewhere if only your systems could keep up.

Why automated voting is the great liberator

This is where the trans­for­mation begins. Modern voting solutions can automat­i­cally collect data from e‑invoicing platforms. ERP systemsand compliance tools then perform row-level matching using the latest tax rules and rates.

Instead of manually searching for discrep­ancies, intel­ligent automation flags discrep­ancies, then catego­rizes them by type (tax point differ­ences, FX mismatches, missing trans­ac­tions) and maps them to the affected VAT or GST return fields.

The impact is immediate and measurable. With drag-and-drop reports, customizable dashboards, and pre-built filters, your team can divide and prior­itize data in minutes instead of days.

Companies imple­menting automated recon­cil­i­a­tions have achieved a 50% reduction in workload for compliance and tax teams, with error rates dropping from 3% to under 0.5%.

When inspection notices arrive or pre-filled returns need to be validated, you no longer have to struggle. You are ready.

The strategic value of automated voting

In a recent survey, 60% of tax profes­sionals said they spend 1 to 5 hours per country per month on recon­cil­i­ation. And 4 in 7 said they would save 20–60% of their time with an automation tool.

With the right automation tool, your team will stop drowning in voting tables and start thinking strate­gi­cally. Instead of reactive “firefighting,” tax profes­sionals can finally focus on tax planning, business model optimization, and advising execu­tives on cross-border expansion.

A majority (59%) of organi­za­tions are now prior­i­tizing Quali­fi­cation of your tax teams for strategic workand automation makes that possible. Your team’s deep indirect tax expertise becomes a compet­itive advantage, not a compliance burden.

You can answer future-oriented questions:

What are the tax impli­ca­tions of entering Southeast Asia?

How will the proposed VAT changes impact our supply chain?

What hidden risks exist in our M&A due diligence?

This strategic increase not only benefits the tax function; It changes the way the entire organi­zation views taxes.

Time to act: Reclaim time with automated voting

Executing real-time audit orders will not slow down and the complexity of recon­cil­i­a­tions will only increase. That’s why Thomson Reuters is investing in the devel­opment of automated voting. Electronic invoicing for VAT return recon­cil­i­ation has been newly added to the ONESOURCE solution package. And a second phase of SAF‑T rollout for e‑invoices and VAT returns will follow soon. A third phase with GL voting and other ONESOURCE solutions is also coming.

Check out our free demo of ONESOURCE Recon­cil­i­a­tions to learn more.

Related Posts